The Law commands and makes us know
What duties to our God we owe;
But ’tis the Gospel must reveal
Where lies our strength to do His will.
The Law discovers guilt and sin
And shows how vile our hearts have been;
The Gospel only can express
Forgiving love and cleansing grace.
What curses doth the Law denounce
Against the man that fails but once!
But in the Gospel Christ appears,
Pard’ning the guilt of numerous years.
My soul, no more attempt to draw
Thy life and comfort from the Law.
Fly to the hope the Gospel gives;
The man that trusts the promise lives.
Sunday, July 29, 2007
Monday, July 23, 2007
Housekeeping issues......the way that offers the best result for the legal profession....
Actuary "Ezekial 25:17 - The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequites of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he that shepherds the weak from the valley of darkness for he is truly his brother's keeper, and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers, and you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee."
July 20, 2007
“Do Judges Systematically Favor the Interests of the Legal Profession?”
Finally (via Lattman), some legal scholarship that promises potent explanatory and predictive value, in the form of a forthcoming Alabama Law Review article by University of Tennessee lawprof Benjamin Barton:
Here is my lawyer-judge hypothesis in a nutshell: many legal outcomes can be explained, and future cases predicted, by asking a very simple question: is there a plausible legal result in this case that will significantly affect the interests of the legal profession (positively or negatively)? If so, the case will be decided in the way that offers the best result for the legal profession....
For example, why are lawyers the only American profession to be truly and completely self-regulated? ...
Why is it that the attorney-client privilege is the oldest and most jealously protected of all the professional privileges?...
Why is the Miranda right to consult with an attorney protected so much more fervently than the right to remain silent?...
Lastly, why is a legal malpractice case so much harder to make out than a medical malpractice case?...
Posted by Walter Olson at 12:13 AM | TrackBack (0)
July 20, 2007
“Do Judges Systematically Favor the Interests of the Legal Profession?”
Finally (via Lattman), some legal scholarship that promises potent explanatory and predictive value, in the form of a forthcoming Alabama Law Review article by University of Tennessee lawprof Benjamin Barton:
Here is my lawyer-judge hypothesis in a nutshell: many legal outcomes can be explained, and future cases predicted, by asking a very simple question: is there a plausible legal result in this case that will significantly affect the interests of the legal profession (positively or negatively)? If so, the case will be decided in the way that offers the best result for the legal profession....
For example, why are lawyers the only American profession to be truly and completely self-regulated? ...
Why is it that the attorney-client privilege is the oldest and most jealously protected of all the professional privileges?...
Why is the Miranda right to consult with an attorney protected so much more fervently than the right to remain silent?...
Lastly, why is a legal malpractice case so much harder to make out than a medical malpractice case?...
Posted by Walter Olson at 12:13 AM | TrackBack (0)
Monday, July 16, 2007
Dear Rick, what is your position on internet censorship in the form of political message boards and blogs?
Dear Rick,
On the www.hcdp.org website it defines the Democratic Platform and the basic inalienable rights. Given the internet was inconceivable at that time, but given that we do have it now, the fact that it is a very tangible means of exercising our first amendment liberties and the phasing out of hard copy documents, what is your position on internet censorship in the form of political message boards and blogs?
We believe every Texan has inalienable rights that even a majority may not take away, including .the right to vote .the right to fair and open participation and representation in the democratic process .the right to privacy.
What kind of legislation and law do you expect to arise in the next 6-10 years?
Actuary "Ezekial 25:17 - The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequites of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he that shepherds the weak from the valley of darkness for he is truly his brother's keeper, and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers, and you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee."
Sunday, July 15, 2007
Nuts101: You hit em high and we will hit em everywhere else. Can you keep that Energy up for 16 months?
Let's go Nuts!
Actuary "Ezekial 25:17 - The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequites of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he that shepherds the weak from the valley of darkness for he is truly his brother's keeper, and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers, and you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee."
Actuary "Ezekial 25:17 - The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequites of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he that shepherds the weak from the valley of darkness for he is truly his brother's keeper, and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers, and you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)